head to head · open source
Bruno vs Apache APISIX
Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars, 2,888 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Apache APISIX has 17,135 stars, 2,946 forks, 235 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Bruno leads on adoption by 174% (47,022 vs 17,135 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; Apache APISIX is written in Lua under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Apache APISIX 17%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | Apache APISIX | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 17K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Lua |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 2.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Apache APISIX if
- You want the Apache APISIX feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Lua
- You evaluated both and Apache APISIX fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.
read the full Bruno overview →
About Apache APISIX
Apache APISIX is a dynamic, real time, high performance API gateway and AI gateway built on NGINX and etcd. It provides rich traffic management features, such as load balancing, dynamic upstream, canary release, circuit breaking, authentication, and observability. The project lives in the Lua and LuaJIT ecosystem, and it uses the Apache 2.0 license.
read the full Apache APISIX overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or Apache APISIX more popular?
Bruno has 47,022 GitHub stars and Apache APISIX has 17,135. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and Apache APISIX free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and Apache APISIX under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and Apache APISIX?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and Apache APISIX in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or Apache APISIX?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,022 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Apache APISIX if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.