head to head · open source
Bruno vs django-ninja
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars, 3,068 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. django-ninja has 9,229 stars, 624 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 420% (47,992 vs 9,229 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; django-ninja is written in Python under MIT. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, django-ninja 7%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (openapi, rest-api), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | django-ninja | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 9.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 624 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick django-ninja if
- You want the django-ninja feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and django-ninja fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno Opensource IDE for exploring and testing APIs. English Українська Русский Türkçe Deutsch Français Português (BR) 한국어 বাংলা Español Italiano Română Polski 简体中文 正體中文 العربية 日本語 ქართული Nederlands فارسی Bruno is a new and innovative API client, aimed at revolutionizing the status quo represented by Postman and similar tools out there. Bruno stores your collections directly in a folder on your filesystem. We use a plain text markup language, Bru, to save information about API requests. You can use Git or any version control of your choice to collaborate over your API collections. Bruno is offline only. There…
read the full Bruno overview →
About django-ninja
^ Please read ^ Fast to learn, fast to code, fast to run Django Ninja Fast Django REST Framework Django Ninja is a web framework for building APIs with Django and Python 3.6+ type hints . Key features: Easy : Designed to be easy to use and intuitive. FAST execution : Very high performance thanks to Pydantic and async support . Fast to code : Type hints and automatic docs lets you focus only on business logic. Standards based : Based on the open standards for APIs: OpenAPI (previously known as Swagger) and JSON Schema . Django friendly : (obviously) has good integration with the Django core and ORM. Production…
read the full django-ninja overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or django-ninja more popular?
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars and django-ninja has 9,229. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and django-ninja free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and django-ninja under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and django-ninja?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and django-ninja in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or django-ninja?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,992 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose django-ninja if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.