head to head · open source
Bruno vs axonhub
Bruno has 47,093 GitHub stars, 2,903 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. axonhub has 5,274 stars, 706 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped today. Bruno leads on adoption by 793% (47,093 vs 5,274 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; axonhub is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, axonhub 13%. axonhub was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | axonhub | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 5.3K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 706 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick axonhub if
- You want the axonhub feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and axonhub fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno is a lightweight, open source API client and IDE for exploring and testing APIs, built for developers and teams who want their request collections stored as plain text in a folder on their own filesystem rather than in a vendor's cloud.
read the full Bruno overview →
About axonhub
AxonHub is an open source AI gateway, written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 licence, that lets an application call 100+ large language models through whichever AI SDK it already uses and switch providers without changing code — built for developers and platform teams who need one self hostable control point for model access, failover, cost and tracing.
read the full axonhub overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or axonhub more popular?
Bruno has 47,093 GitHub stars and axonhub has 5,274. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and axonhub free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and axonhub under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and axonhub?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and axonhub in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or axonhub?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,093 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose axonhub if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.