head to head · open source
Bruno vs apinto
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars, 3,068 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. apinto has 1,682 stars, 260 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Bruno leads on adoption by 2,753% (47,992 vs 1,682 stars). Bruno is written in JavaScript under MIT; apinto is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Bruno has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, apinto 15%. Bruno was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Bruno | apinto | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 260 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Bruno if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick apinto if
- You want the apinto feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and apinto fits your workflow better
About Bruno
Bruno Opensource IDE for exploring and testing APIs. English Українська Русский Türkçe Deutsch Français Português (BR) 한국어 বাংলা Español Italiano Română Polski 简体中文 正體中文 العربية 日本語 ქართული Nederlands فارسی Bruno is a new and innovative API client, aimed at revolutionizing the status quo represented by Postman and similar tools out there. Bruno stores your collections directly in a folder on your filesystem. We use a plain text markup language, Bru, to save information about API requests. You can use Git or any version control of your choice to collaborate over your API collections. Bruno is offline only. There…
read the full Bruno overview →
About apinto
Apinto Apinto是一款高性能、可扩展、易维护的云原生API网关。 Apinto网关基于GO语言模块化开发，5分钟极速部署，配置简单、易于维护，支持集群与动态扩容，并且提供几十款网关插件和实用的企业级插件，让用户开箱即用。 Demo 体验地址：demo dashboard.apinto.com 提供了三个试用账号，避免被使用者挤下来 账号：apinto 1 密码：12345678 账号：apinto 2 密码：12345678 账号：apinto 3 密码：12345678 快速入门： Apinto Dashboard github地址： Apinto功能架构图： Apinto亮点特性 Apinto API 网关以出色的用户体验和适用于各种企业级业务场景的控制台为特色。控制台具有四大亮点功能：集群管理、应用管理、精细服务治理和企业插件，能够满足企业对 API 网关更高级场景化需求的要求。 集群管理 Apinto 提供集群管理功能，可以一次性配置业务并将其发布到相应的集群。这解决了多集群维护多套业务配置的问题，显著提高了运维效率，并降低了繁杂配置时的事故率。 应用管理 Apinto 网关推出应用管理概念，统一管理应用及其生命周期。作为业务通讯的发起者，应用贯穿整个调用链。Apinto 网关对应用请求的流量进行鉴权认证和服务治理，并对请求的流量进行监控告警，统计应用调用情况。 精细化服务治理…
read the full apinto overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Bruno or apinto more popular?
Bruno has 47,992 GitHub stars and apinto has 1,682. Bruno has the larger community by that measure.
Are Bruno and apinto free?
Both are open source. Bruno is licensed under MIT and apinto under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Bruno and apinto?
Bruno is written in JavaScript and apinto in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Bruno or apinto?
Choose Bruno if you want the larger community (47,992 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose apinto if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.