head to head · open source

JumpServer vs Better Auth

JumpServer has 31,549 GitHub stars, 5,791 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Better Auth has 29,988 stars, 2,894 forks, 723 open issues and last shipped yesterday. JumpServer leads on adoption by 5% (31,549 vs 29,988 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Better Auth is written in TypeScript under MIT. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, Better Auth 10%. Better Auth was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K Better Auth ★ 30K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer Better Auth
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 30K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick Better Auth if

  • You want the Better Auth feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Better Auth fits your workflow better

full Better Auth profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About Better Auth

Better Auth is a framework agnostic authentication and authorization framework written in TypeScript. It targets the broader JavaScript/TypeScript ecosystem and is designed to integrate with any backend or frontend framework, including Next.js, Express, SvelteKit, and others. It provides a unified API surface for core identity workflows such as sign up, sign in, session management, and passwordless flows.

read the full Better Auth overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik keycloak vs authentik keycloak vs supertokens keycloak vs zitadel puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase puter vs projectdiscovery

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Zitadel JumpServer vs Logto JumpServer vs Ory JumpServer vs Hexclave JumpServer vs Permify JumpServer vs Authgear

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or Better Auth more popular?

JumpServer has 31,549 GitHub stars and Better Auth has 29,988. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and Better Auth free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Better Auth under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and Better Auth?

JumpServer is written in Python and Better Auth in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or Better Auth?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,549 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Better Auth if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.