head to head · open source

astron-agent vs sidequest

astron-agent has 9,017 GitHub stars, 887 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. sidequest has 1,015 stars, 25 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. astron-agent leads on adoption by 788% (9,017 vs 1,015 stars). astron-agent is written in Java under Apache-2.0; sidequest is written in TypeScript under LGPL-3.0. astron-agent has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, sidequest 2%. astron-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

astron-agent ★ 9.0K sidequest ★ 1.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

astron-agent sidequest
GitHub stars ★ 9.0K ★ 1.0K
License Apache-2.0 LGPL-3.0
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 887 ⑂ 25
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick astron-agent if

  • You weight community size — 9.0K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full astron-agent profile →

pick sidequest if

  • You want the sidequest feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and sidequest fits your workflow better

full sidequest profile →

About astron-agent

Astron Agent is an enterprise grade, commercial friendly agentic workflow platform for building next generation SuperAgents, aimed at organizations that need to orchestrate AI workflows, models, tools, and RPA automation in production rather than in a demo.

read the full astron-agent overview →

About sidequest

Sidequest is a Redis free background job processor for Node.js that persists jobs in the PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, or MongoDB database an application already runs, aimed at teams that need durable, distributed queue processing without operating Redis.

read the full sidequest overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

astron-agent vs ansible astron-agent vs compose astron-agent vs conductor astron-agent vs xxl-job astron-agent vs gitleaks astron-agent vs Kestra astron-agent vs haystack astron-agent vs rancher astron-agent vs Prefect astron-agent vs Archon astron-agent vs Temporal astron-agent vs rowboat

Frequently asked questions

Is astron-agent or sidequest more popular?

astron-agent has 9,017 GitHub stars and sidequest has 1,015. astron-agent has the larger community by that measure.

Are astron-agent and sidequest free?

Both are open source. astron-agent is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sidequest under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between astron-agent and sidequest?

astron-agent is written in Java and sidequest in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, astron-agent or sidequest?

Choose astron-agent if you want the larger community (9,017 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose sidequest if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.