head to head · open source
conductor vs astron-agent
conductor has 32,213 GitHub stars, 1,012 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. astron-agent has 9,017 stars, 887 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. conductor leads on adoption by 257% (32,213 vs 9,017 stars). conductor is written in Java under Apache-2.0; astron-agent is written in Java under Apache-2.0. conductor has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, astron-agent 10%. conductor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| conductor | astron-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 9.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.0K | ⑂ 887 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick conductor if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick astron-agent if
- You want the astron-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and astron-agent fits your workflow better
About conductor
Conductor is an Apache 2.0 licensed, event driven agentic workflow engine written in Java that provides durable and highly resilient execution for applications and AI agents, aimed at teams running microservices, AI agents, and adaptive workflow graphs that need orchestration they can version, inspect, and recover.
read the full conductor overview →
About astron-agent
Astron Agent is an enterprise grade, commercial friendly agentic workflow platform for building next generation SuperAgents, aimed at organizations that need to orchestrate AI workflows, models, tools, and RPA automation in production rather than in a demo.
read the full astron-agent overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is conductor or astron-agent more popular?
conductor has 32,213 GitHub stars and astron-agent has 9,017. conductor has the larger community by that measure.
Are conductor and astron-agent free?
Both are open source. conductor is licensed under Apache-2.0 and astron-agent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between conductor and astron-agent?
conductor is written in Java and astron-agent in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, conductor or astron-agent?
Choose conductor if you want the larger community (32,213 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose astron-agent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.