head to head · open source

compose vs astron-agent

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars, 5,825 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. astron-agent has 9,017 stars, 887 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. compose leads on adoption by 324% (38,195 vs 9,017 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; astron-agent is written in Java under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, astron-agent 10%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K astron-agent ★ 9.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose astron-agent
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 9.0K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 887
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick astron-agent if

  • You want the astron-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and astron-agent fits your workflow better

full astron-agent profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About astron-agent

Astron Agent is an enterprise grade, commercial friendly agentic workflow platform for building next generation SuperAgents, aimed at organizations that need to orchestrate AI workflows, models, tools, and RPA automation in production rather than in a demo.

read the full astron-agent overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs ansible compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or astron-agent more popular?

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars and astron-agent has 9,017. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and astron-agent free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and astron-agent under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and astron-agent?

compose is written in Go and astron-agent in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or astron-agent?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,195 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose astron-agent if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.