head to head · open source

PocketBase vs Alokai

PocketBase has 61,070 GitHub stars, 3,688 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Alokai has 10,942 stars, 2,064 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. PocketBase leads on adoption by 458% (61,070 vs 10,942 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; Alokai is written in various languages under a licence not recorded in this registry. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Alokai 19%. PocketBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K Alokai ★ 11K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase Alokai
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 11K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Go
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-06-09
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 2.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick Alokai if

  • You want the Alokai feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You evaluated both and Alokai fits your workflow better

full Alokai profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About Alokai

Alokai is an open source ecosystem of developer tools and a Frontend as a Service solution for composable commerce. It lives in the headless commerce ecosystem, where ecommerce backends expose APIs and separate frontend applications deliver storefronts.

read the full Alokai overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs supabase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith PocketBase vs TipTap PocketBase vs Directus PocketBase vs Budibase PocketBase vs Onlook PocketBase vs Teable PocketBase vs Convex PocketBase vs KeystoneJS PocketBase vs HeyForm

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or Alokai more popular?

PocketBase has 61,070 GitHub stars and Alokai has 10,942. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and Alokai free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT, and Alokai has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between PocketBase and Alokai?

PocketBase is written in Go and Alokai in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or Alokai?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,070 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Alokai if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.