head to head · open source

PocketBase vs Teable

PocketBase has 61,070 GitHub stars, 3,688 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Teable has 21,800 stars, 1,346 forks, 128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PocketBase leads on adoption by 180% (61,070 vs 21,800 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; Teable is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Teable 6%. Teable was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K Teable ★ 22K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase Teable
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 22K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick Teable if

  • You want the Teable feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Teable fits your workflow better

full Teable profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About Teable

Teable is a TypeScript based database and spreadsheet platform positioned as an open alternative to Retool and as an Airtable alternative. It combines PostgreSQL data management, AI workflows, app building, and team collaboration in one system, with a hosted version at teable.ai and self hosted options.

read the full Teable overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs supabase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith PocketBase vs TipTap PocketBase vs Directus PocketBase vs Budibase PocketBase vs Onlook PocketBase vs Convex PocketBase vs Alokai PocketBase vs KeystoneJS PocketBase vs HeyForm

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or Teable more popular?

PocketBase has 61,070 GitHub stars and Teable has 21,800. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and Teable free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT, and Teable has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between PocketBase and Teable?

PocketBase is written in Go and Teable in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or Teable?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,070 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Teable if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.