head to head · open source

alive-progress vs Sayr

alive-progress has 6,307 GitHub stars, 236 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Sayr has 24 stars, 1 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped yesterday. alive-progress leads on adoption by 26,179% (6,307 vs 24 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; Sayr is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Sayr 4%. Sayr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

alive-progress ★ 6.3K Sayr ★ 24 category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

alive-progress Sayr
GitHub stars ★ 6.3K ★ 24
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-05-24 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 236 ⑂ 1
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick alive-progress if

  • You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full alive-progress profile →

pick Sayr if

  • You want the Sayr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Sayr fits your workflow better

full Sayr profile →

About alive-progress

alive progress is a Python progress bar library for long running command line processing, aimed at developers who need live throughput, an accurate ETA, and rich terminal animation instead of a static bar.

read the full alive-progress overview →

About Sayr

Sayr is a source available, self hostable project management platform that pairs an internal task board with a built in public feedback portal, so a product team can work privately while its users submit feedback, vote on features, and watch progress from the same tool.

read the full Sayr overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K

Related comparisons

giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs fider giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core

More Collaboration & Feedback projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.

alive-progress vs giscus alive-progress vs GameDevMind alive-progress vs Fider alive-progress vs guiadofrontend alive-progress vs guiadobackend alive-progress vs Artalk alive-progress vs democracyos alive-progress vs human-review alive-progress vs LogChimp alive-progress vs helios-server alive-progress vs Autolab alive-progress vs mouthful

Frequently asked questions

Is alive-progress or Sayr more popular?

alive-progress has 6,307 GitHub stars and Sayr has 24. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.

Are alive-progress and Sayr free?

Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT, and Sayr has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between alive-progress and Sayr?

alive-progress is written in Python and Sayr in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, alive-progress or Sayr?

Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,307 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Sayr if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.