head to head · open source
alive-progress vs django-comments-xtd
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars, 242 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. django-comments-xtd has 621 stars, 158 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. alive-progress leads on adoption by 918% (6,323 vs 621 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; django-comments-xtd is written in HTML under BSD-2-Clause. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, django-comments-xtd 25%. django-comments-xtd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | django-comments-xtd | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 621 |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 242 | ⑂ 158 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick django-comments-xtd if
- You want the django-comments-xtd feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and django-comments-xtd fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress Have you ever wondered where your lengthy processing was at, and when would it finish? Do you usually hit RETURN several times to make sure it didn't crash, or the SSH connection didn't freeze? Have you ever thought it'd be awesome to be able to pause some processing without hassle, return to the Python prompt to manually fix some items, then seamlessly resume it? I did... I've started this new progress bar thinking about all that, behold the alive progress ! 😃 Introducing the newest concept in progress bars for Python! alive progress is in a class of its own, with an array of cool features that…
read the full alive-progress overview →
About django-comments-xtd
django comments xtd Work on version 3.0 is taking place in the main branch. When curious, take a look at the e2e project . Still some points TODO.md to have it ready. 🚀 A Django pluggable application that adds comments to your project. It extends the original Django Comments Framework with the following features: Thread support, so comments can be nested. Customizable maximum thread level on per app.model basis. Optional notifications on follow up comments via email. Mute links to allow cancellation of follow up notifications. Comment confirmation via email when users are not authenticated. Comments hit the…
read the full django-comments-xtd overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or django-comments-xtd more popular?
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars and django-comments-xtd has 621. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and django-comments-xtd free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and django-comments-xtd under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between alive-progress and django-comments-xtd?
alive-progress is written in Python and django-comments-xtd in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or django-comments-xtd?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,323 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose django-comments-xtd if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.