head to head · open source
alive-progress vs chirpy
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars, 242 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. chirpy has 600 stars, 36 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. alive-progress leads on adoption by 954% (6,323 vs 600 stars). alive-progress is written in Python under MIT; chirpy is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. alive-progress has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, chirpy 6%. chirpy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| alive-progress | chirpy | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.3K | ★ 600 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-05-24 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 242 | ⑂ 36 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick alive-progress if
- You weight community size — 6.3K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chirpy if
- You want the chirpy feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and chirpy fits your workflow better
About alive-progress
alive progress Have you ever wondered where your lengthy processing was at, and when would it finish? Do you usually hit RETURN several times to make sure it didn't crash, or the SSH connection didn't freeze? Have you ever thought it'd be awesome to be able to pause some processing without hassle, return to the Python prompt to manually fix some items, then seamlessly resume it? I did... I've started this new progress bar thinking about all that, behold the alive progress ! 😃 Introducing the newest concept in progress bars for Python! alive progress is in a class of its own, with an array of cool features that…
read the full alive-progress overview →
About chirpy
Chirpy 简体中文 👋 Chirpy is a privacy friendly and customizable Disqus(comment system) alternate. Try it now: Playground. More screenshots Like what you see? Give Chirpy a GitHub Star ⭐, it will help us a lot! ✨ Key features 🔒 Privacy friendly 🎨 Customizable widget ✍️ Rich Text Formatting & Markdown shortcuts 📊 Widget analytics 🪄 Real time comments 📱 Mobile friendly 🔔 Email & Web push notifications 🤐 Anti toxic comment 💬 Comment moderation 🎭 Anonymous sign in 📬 Email/magic link sign in 🧭 Roadmap Although Chirpy is ready to serve you and your users, we're working hard to add more features: More custom…
read the full chirpy overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is alive-progress or chirpy more popular?
alive-progress has 6,323 GitHub stars and chirpy has 600. alive-progress has the larger community by that measure.
Are alive-progress and chirpy free?
Both are open source. alive-progress is licensed under MIT and chirpy under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between alive-progress and chirpy?
alive-progress is written in Python and chirpy in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, alive-progress or chirpy?
Choose alive-progress if you want the larger community (6,323 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose chirpy if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.