head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs landscape

AdGuardHome has 37,091 GitHub stars, 2,524 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. landscape has 1,558 stars, 121 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped today. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 2,281% (37,091 vs 1,558 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; landscape is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, landscape 8%. landscape was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K landscape ★ 1.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome landscape
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.6K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 121
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick landscape if

  • You want the landscape feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and landscape fits your workflow better

full landscape profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About landscape

Landscape is an open source router platform that configures a standard Linux distribution as a router by steering traffic by domain rather than IP alone, built in Rust with eBPF and aimed at self hosters who want policy routing on hardware and distributions they already control.

read the full landscape overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs adguardhome frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs cloudflared AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or landscape more popular?

AdGuardHome has 37,091 GitHub stars and landscape has 1,558. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and landscape free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and landscape under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and landscape?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and landscape in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or landscape?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (37,091 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose landscape if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.