head to head · open source

AdGuardHome vs hestiacp

AdGuardHome has 37,023 GitHub stars, 2,523 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped today. hestiacp has 4,503 stars, 945 forks, 146 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 722% (37,023 vs 4,503 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; hestiacp is written in Shell under GPL-3.0. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, hestiacp 21%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AdGuardHome ★ 37K hestiacp ★ 4.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

AdGuardHome hestiacp
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 4.5K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Shell
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 945
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AdGuardHome profile →

pick hestiacp if

  • You want the hestiacp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and hestiacp fits your workflow better

full hestiacp profile →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

About hestiacp

Hestia Control Panel is a GPL 3.0, shell based control panel that gives Linux server administrators a web and command line interface for deploying and managing web domains, mail accounts, DNS zones, and databases on Debian and Ubuntu servers.

read the full hestiacp overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs adguardhome frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx caddy vs traefik frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

AdGuardHome vs frp AdGuardHome vs caddy AdGuardHome vs traefik AdGuardHome vs nginx AdGuardHome vs algo AdGuardHome vs nginx-proxy AdGuardHome vs goproxy AdGuardHome vs openvpn-install AdGuardHome vs cloudflared AdGuardHome vs amnezia-client AdGuardHome vs OpenVPN AdGuardHome vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is AdGuardHome or hestiacp more popular?

AdGuardHome has 37,023 GitHub stars and hestiacp has 4,503. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.

Are AdGuardHome and hestiacp free?

Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and hestiacp under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AdGuardHome and hestiacp?

AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and hestiacp in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or hestiacp?

Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (37,023 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose hestiacp if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.