head to head · open source
AdGuardHome vs gost
AdGuardHome has 38,218 GitHub stars, 2,601 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. gost has 7,808 stars, 847 forks, 101 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. AdGuardHome leads on adoption by 389% (38,218 vs 7,808 stars). AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0; gost is written in Go under MIT. AdGuardHome has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, gost 11%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (dns, golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| AdGuardHome | gost | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 38K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 847 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick AdGuardHome if
- You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gost if
- You want the gost feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and gost fits your workflow better
About AdGuardHome
Privacy protection center for you and your devices Free and open source, powerful network wide ads & trackers blocking DNS server. AdGuard.com Wiki Reddit Twitter Telegram AdGuard Home is a network wide software for blocking ads and tracking. After you set it up, it'll cover ALL your home devices, and you don't need any client side software for that. It operates as a DNS server that re routes tracking domains to a “black hole”, thus preventing your devices from connecting to those servers. It's based on software we use for our public [AdGuard DNS] servers, and both share a lot of code. [AdGuard DNS]: Getting…
read the full AdGuardHome overview →
About gost
GO Simple Tunnel GO语言实现的安全隧道 功能特性 [x] 多端口监听 [x] 多级转发链 [x] 多协议支持 [x] TCP/UDP端口转发 [x] 反向代理和隧道 [x] TCP/UDP透明代理 [x] DNS解析和代理 [x] TUN/TAP设备与TUN2SOCKS [x] 负载均衡 [x] 路由控制 [x] 准入控制 [x] 限速限流 [x] 插件系统 [x] Prometheus监控指标 [x] 动态配置 [x] Web API [x] GUI/WebUI 概览 GOST作为隧道有三种主要使用方式。 正向代理 作为代理服务访问网络，可以组合使用多种协议组成转发链进行转发。 端口转发 将一个服务的端口映射到另外一个服务的端口，同样可以组合使用多种协议组成转发链进行转发。 反向代理 利用隧道和内网穿透将内网服务暴露到公网访问。 下载安装 二进制文件 系统包（DEB/RPM） 从 Releases 下载对应架构的安装包（ amd64 、 amd64v3 、 arm64 ）： amd64v3 包需要支持 AVX2 的 CPU（x86 64 v3），否则请使用 amd64 。 安装包附带 systemd 服务，但不会自动启用：先创建 /etc/gost/gost.yml （示例见 /usr/share/doc/gost/examples/gost.yml ），再执行 sudo systemctl…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is AdGuardHome or gost more popular?
AdGuardHome has 38,218 GitHub stars and gost has 7,808. AdGuardHome has the larger community by that measure.
Are AdGuardHome and gost free?
Both are open source. AdGuardHome is licensed under GPL-3.0 and gost under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between AdGuardHome and gost?
AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript and gost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, AdGuardHome or gost?
Choose AdGuardHome if you want the larger community (38,218 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose gost if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.