head to head · open source

JumpServer vs Zitadel

JumpServer has 31,549 GitHub stars, 5,791 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Zitadel has 15,041 stars, 1,309 forks, 1,171 open issues and last shipped yesterday. JumpServer leads on adoption by 110% (31,549 vs 15,041 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Zitadel is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, Zitadel 9%. Zitadel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K Zitadel ★ 15K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer Zitadel
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 15K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick Zitadel if

  • You want the Zitadel feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Zitadel fits your workflow better

full Zitadel profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About Zitadel

Zitadel is an open source identity and access management platform written in Go and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It lives in the open source IAM ecosystem and provides identity infrastructure for developers who need to operate an authentication and authorization layer themselves.

read the full Zitadel overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik keycloak vs zitadel keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik better-auth vs authentik keycloak vs supertokens puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Better Auth JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Logto JumpServer vs Ory JumpServer vs Hexclave JumpServer vs Permify JumpServer vs Authgear

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or Zitadel more popular?

JumpServer has 31,549 GitHub stars and Zitadel has 15,041. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and Zitadel free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Zitadel under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and Zitadel?

JumpServer is written in Python and Zitadel in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or Zitadel?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,549 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Zitadel if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.