head to head · open source

zipkin vs Keep

zipkin has 17,461 GitHub stars, 3,098 forks, 175 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Keep has 12,331 stars, 1,508 forks, 609 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. zipkin leads on adoption by 42% (17,461 vs 12,331 stars). zipkin is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Keep is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence. zipkin has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, Keep 12%. Keep was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zipkin ★ 17K Keep ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

zipkin Keep
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Java Python
Last push 2026-08-06 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zipkin if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zipkin profile →

pick Keep if

  • You want the Keep feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Keep fits your workflow better

full Keep profile →

About zipkin

Zipkin is a distributed tracing system maintained under the OpenZipkin organization and written in Java, released under the Apache 2.0 license. It lives in the Java and JVM ecosystem as a standalone server, while its instrumentation libraries span many languages. The project gathers the timing data needed to troubleshoot latency problems in service architectures, and it covers both the collection and the lookup of that data.

read the full zipkin overview →

About Keep

Keep is the open source AIOps and alert management platform: a Python based single pane of glass that unifies alerts and incidents, deduplicates and enriches them, and automates response through declarative YAML workflows, aimed at the SRE, platform and on call teams that operate many monitoring tools at once.

read the full Keep overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

zipkin vs Uptime Kuma zipkin vs worldmonitor zipkin vs NetData zipkin vs Grafana zipkin vs huginn zipkin vs Sentry zipkin vs SigNoz zipkin vs Grafana Loki zipkin vs beszel zipkin vs cilium zipkin vs Apache SkyWalking zipkin vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is zipkin or Keep more popular?

zipkin has 17,461 GitHub stars and Keep has 12,331. zipkin has the larger community by that measure.

Are zipkin and Keep free?

Both are open source. zipkin is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Keep has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between zipkin and Keep?

zipkin is written in Java and Keep in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zipkin or Keep?

Choose zipkin if you want the larger community (17,461 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Keep if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.