head to head · open source

Puter vs Zen

Puter has 43,565 GitHub stars, 4,066 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped today. Zen has 4,225 stars, 143 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Puter leads on adoption by 931% (43,565 vs 4,225 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Zen is written in Go under MIT. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Zen 3%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (gui), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K Zen ★ 4.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter Zen
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 4.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 143
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick Zen if

  • You want the Zen feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Zen fits your workflow better

full Zen profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About Zen

Zen is an open source desktop application written in Go for Windows, macOS, and Linux under the MIT license. It operates as a system wide ad blocker and privacy guard, so it applies to traffic from applications on the machine rather than only to browser tabs. It lives in the desktop security and privacy ecosystem, where users want filtering without browser extensions.

read the full Zen overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs vault puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs nextcloud mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs certificates Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Certipy Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Zen more popular?

Puter has 43,565 GitHub stars and Zen has 4,225. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and Zen free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Zen under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and Zen?

Puter is written in TypeScript and Zen in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or Zen?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,565 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Zen if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.