head to head · open source

Mattermost vs Zulip

Mattermost has 39,096 GitHub stars, 9,005 forks, 1,012 open issues and last shipped today. Zulip has 25,922 stars, 10,250 forks, 2,008 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Mattermost leads on adoption by 51% (39,096 vs 25,922 stars). Mattermost is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Zulip is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Mattermost has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, Zulip 40%. Mattermost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (collaboration, react-native), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Mattermost ★ 39K Zulip ★ 26K category Security & Privacy

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Mattermost Zulip
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 26K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 9.0K ⑂ 10K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Mattermost if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Mattermost profile →

pick Zulip if

  • You want the Zulip feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Zulip fits your workflow better

full Zulip profile →

About Mattermost

Mattermost is an open core, self hosted collaboration platform for teams that need secure chat, workflow automation, voice calling, screen sharing, and AI integration while keeping the deployment under their own control.

read the full Mattermost overview →

About Zulip

Zulip is an open source organized team chat application built on topic based threading, aimed at distributed teams that need live and asynchronous conversation in one place, and it is positioned as an open alternative to Slack.

read the full Zulip overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs vault mattermost vs unkey mattermost vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs tracecat mattermost vs tirreno mattermost vs marble puter vs signal puter vs ente signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Mattermost vs Puter Mattermost vs Signal Mattermost vs Ente Mattermost vs Element Mattermost vs Fluxer Mattermost vs Tuta Mattermost vs Zen Mattermost vs Cinny Mattermost vs Stoat Mattermost vs Quiet Mattermost vs Wire Mattermost vs Peergos

Frequently asked questions

Is Mattermost or Zulip more popular?

Mattermost has 39,096 GitHub stars and Zulip has 25,922. Mattermost has the larger community by that measure.

Are Mattermost and Zulip free?

Both are open source. Mattermost has no licence declared in this registry, and Zulip is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Mattermost and Zulip?

Mattermost is written in TypeScript and Zulip in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Mattermost or Zulip?

Choose Mattermost if you want the larger community (39,096 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Zulip if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.