head to head · open source

Puter vs Marble

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars, 4,062 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Marble has 601 stars, 86 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Puter leads on adoption by 7,147% (43,557 vs 601 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Marble is written in HTML under a custom or non-standard licence. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Marble 14%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K Marble ★ 601 category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter Marble
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 601
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript HTML
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 86
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick Marble if

  • You want the Marble feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and Marble fits your workflow better

full Marble profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About Marble

Marble is an open source, real time decision engine for fraud detection and AML compliance that fintechs, banks and crypto exchanges self host or run as SaaS to handle transaction monitoring, screening and case investigation.

read the full Marble overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs tirreno mattermost vs marble keycloak vs marble tailscale vs marble puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade puter vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente mattermost vs tirreno keycloak vs tirreno tailscale vs tirreno mattermost vs vault mattermost vs unkey vault vs unkey

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire Puter vs Peergos

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Marble more popular?

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars and Marble has 601. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and Marble free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Marble has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Puter and Marble?

Puter is written in TypeScript and Marble in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or Marble?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,557 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Marble if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.