head to head · open source

Puter vs Certipy

Puter has 43,550 GitHub stars, 4,064 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Certipy has 3,670 stars, 484 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Puter leads on adoption by 1,087% (43,550 vs 3,670 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Certipy is written in Python under MIT. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Certipy 13%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K Certipy ★ 3.7K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter Certipy
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 3.7K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-07-30
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 484
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick Certipy if

  • You want the Certipy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Certipy fits your workflow better

full Certipy profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About Certipy

Certipy is an open source Python toolkit, published under the MIT licence on PyPI as certipy ad , for enumerating and abusing Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS), built for red teamers, penetration testers, and defenders who need to assess AD CS misconfigurations in Windows Active Directory environments.

read the full Certipy overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade puter vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs nextcloud mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs certificates Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Certipy more popular?

Puter has 43,550 GitHub stars and Certipy has 3,670. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and Certipy free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Certipy under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and Certipy?

Puter is written in TypeScript and Certipy in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or Certipy?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,550 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Certipy if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.