head to head · open source

Puter vs Signal

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars, 4,062 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Signal has 29,352 stars, 6,888 forks, 498 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Puter leads on adoption by 48% (43,557 vs 29,352 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Signal is written in Kotlin under AGPL-3.0. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Signal 23%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K Signal ★ 29K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter Signal
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 29K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 6.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick Signal if

  • You want the Signal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and Signal fits your workflow better

full Signal profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About Signal

Signal Android is a secure messaging application for Android devices that delivers private communication via end to end encryption. Developed by Signal Messenger, LLC, it operates within the broader Signal ecosystem, which includes official iOS and desktop clients. The app uses mobile data or Wi Fi to send and receive encrypted messages, voice calls, and video calls without relying on traditional SMS or telephony infrastructure.

read the full Signal overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs ente mattermost vs signal signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade puter vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs ente mattermost vs vault mattermost vs unkey vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire Puter vs Peergos Puter vs SAMA

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Signal more popular?

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars and Signal has 29,352. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and Signal free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Signal under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and Signal?

Puter is written in TypeScript and Signal in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or Signal?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,557 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Signal if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.