head to head · open source

Puter vs certificates

Puter has 43,550 GitHub stars, 4,064 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. certificates has 8,878 stars, 594 forks, 299 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Puter leads on adoption by 391% (43,550 vs 8,878 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; certificates is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, certificates 7%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K certificates ★ 8.9K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter certificates
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 8.9K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 594
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick certificates if

  • You want the certificates feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and certificates fits your workflow better

full certificates profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About certificates

step ca is an open source online certificate authority that issues X.509 and SSH certificates and runs as an ACME server, built for DevOps teams that need automated certificate management without a commercial PKI contract.

read the full certificates overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade puter vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs nextcloud mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Certipy Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or certificates more popular?

Puter has 43,550 GitHub stars and certificates has 8,878. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and certificates free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and certificates under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and certificates?

Puter is written in TypeScript and certificates in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or certificates?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,550 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose certificates if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.