head to head · open source

xxl-job vs tork

xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars, 11,486 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. tork has 817 stars, 63 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. xxl-job leads on adoption by 3,641% (30,562 vs 817 stars). xxl-job is written in Java under GPL-3.0; tork is written in Go under MIT. xxl-job has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, tork 8%. tork was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (distributed, scheduler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

xxl-job ★ 31K tork ★ 817 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

xxl-job tork
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 817
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-07-21 2026-07-21
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 63
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick xxl-job if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full xxl-job profile →

pick tork if

  • You want the tork feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and tork fits your workflow better

full tork profile →

About xxl-job

XXL JOB is a distributed task scheduling framework written in Java and released under the GPL 3.0 licence, built for teams that need scheduled jobs to run reliably across a cluster of machines rather than inside a single application process.

read the full xxl-job overview →

About tork

Tork is a lightweight, distributed workflow engine written in Go and released under the MIT license. It runs each task of a job as a script inside its own container, so work is defined in YAML rather than as compiled code. The project lives in the Go ecosystem and uses Docker, Podman, or a plain shell as its task runtime, with PostgreSQL as the datastore and a message broker such as RabbitMQ for distributed operation.

read the full tork overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs xxl-job conductor vs xxl-job compose vs conductor compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

xxl-job vs compose xxl-job vs conductor xxl-job vs gitleaks xxl-job vs Kestra xxl-job vs haystack xxl-job vs rancher xxl-job vs Prefect xxl-job vs Archon xxl-job vs Temporal xxl-job vs rowboat xxl-job vs Trigger xxl-job vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is xxl-job or tork more popular?

xxl-job has 30,562 GitHub stars and tork has 817. xxl-job has the larger community by that measure.

Are xxl-job and tork free?

Both are open source. xxl-job is licensed under GPL-3.0 and tork under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between xxl-job and tork?

xxl-job is written in Java and tork in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, xxl-job or tork?

Choose xxl-job if you want the larger community (30,562 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tork if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.