head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs tracing

worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tracing has 6,950 stars, 959 forks, 887 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,195% (90,021 vs 6,950 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; tracing is written in Rust under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, tracing 14%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 90K tracing ★ 7.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor tracing
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 7.0K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-29
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 959
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick tracing if

  • You want the tracing feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and tracing fits your workflow better

full tracing profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About tracing

![Tracing — Structured, application level diagnostics][splash] [splash]: [![Crates.io][crates badge]][crates url] [![Documentation][docs badge]][docs url] [![Documentation (v0.2.x)][docs v0.2.x badge]][docs v0.2.x url] [![MIT licensed][mit badge]][mit url] [![Build Status][actions badge]][actions url] [![Discord chat][discord badge]][discord url] [crates badge]: [crates url]: [docs badge]: [docs url]: [docs v0.2.x badge]: [docs v0.2.x url]: [mit badge]: [mit url]: LICENSE [actions badge]: [actions url]: [discord badge]: [discord url]: Website Chat Overview tracing is a framework for instrumenting Rust programs…

read the full tracing overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or tracing more popular?

worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and tracing has 6,950. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and tracing free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and tracing under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and tracing?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and tracing in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or tracing?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tracing if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.