head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs tapir

worldmonitor has 86,752 GitHub stars, 13,161 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tapir has 1,473 stars, 468 forks, 173 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 5,789% (86,752 vs 1,473 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; tapir is written in Scala under Apache-2.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, tapir 32%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K tapir ★ 1.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor tapir
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 1.5K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Scala
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 468
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick tapir if

  • You want the tapir feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Scala
  • You evaluated both and tapir fits your workflow better

full tapir profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About tapir

Tapir is a Scala library that lets developers describe an HTTP API once in a type safe, declarative form and then expose that description as a server, consume it as a client, and generate OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, and JSON Schema documentation from it, and it is aimed at Scala teams building HTTP services that want their API documentation to stay in step with their code.

read the full tapir overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana worldmonitor vs openvpn worldmonitor vs wr-do worldmonitor vs plakar worldmonitor vs pluton n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or tapir more popular?

worldmonitor has 86,752 GitHub stars and tapir has 1,473. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and tapir free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and tapir under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and tapir?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and tapir in Scala. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or tapir?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,752 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose tapir if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.