head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs Statusnook
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Statusnook has 988 stars, 32 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2.0 years ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 9,011% (90,021 vs 988 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Statusnook is written in Go under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Statusnook 3%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | Statusnook | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 988 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2024-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 32 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Statusnook if
- You want the Statusnook feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Statusnook fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About Statusnook
Effortlessly deploy a status page and start monitoring endpoints in minutes Deployment paths Standalone Quickly deploy Statusnook with managed TLS. Requires ports 80 and 443 Reverse proxy Deploy Statusnook behind Caddy, NGINX, etc. Docker CLI compose.yaml One click cloud templates Binaries amd64 and arm64 Linux binaries can be found on the Releases page. Configuration Statusnook has the following configuration options: Web UI based config Text based config (YAML) via the settings page, or on push via GitHub Learn more about configuration Gallery
read the full Statusnook overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or Statusnook more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and Statusnook has 988. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and Statusnook free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Statusnook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and Statusnook?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and Statusnook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or Statusnook?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Statusnook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.