head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs resilience4j

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. resilience4j has 10,763 stars, 1,501 forks, 306 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 705% (86,684 vs 10,763 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; resilience4j is written in Java under Apache-2.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, resilience4j 14%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K resilience4j ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor resilience4j
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 11K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick resilience4j if

  • You want the resilience4j feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and resilience4j fits your workflow better

full resilience4j profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About resilience4j

Resilience4j is a lightweight fault tolerance library for Java, designed around functional programming. It lives in the Java ecosystem and is distributed under the Apache 2.0 license. The library provides higher order functions, called decorators, that enhance any functional interface, lambda expression or method reference with a Circuit Breaker, Rate Limiter, Retry or Bulkhead. Version 3 of the library requires Java 21, while the project originated as a library for Java 8. The repository has been active for roughly eleven years and carries 10,760 stars, 1,499 forks and 306 open issues.

read the full resilience4j overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs openvpn worldmonitor vs wr-do worldmonitor vs plakar worldmonitor vs pluton uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or resilience4j more popular?

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and resilience4j has 10,763. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and resilience4j free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and resilience4j under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and resilience4j?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and resilience4j in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or resilience4j?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose resilience4j if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.