head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs qtap
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. qtap has 1,465 stars, 57 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 6,045% (90,021 vs 1,465 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; qtap is written in C under Apache-2.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, qtap 4%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | C |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 57 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick qtap if
- You want the qtap feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and qtap fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About qtap
An eBPF agent that captures traffic flowing through the Linux kernel. By attaching to TLS/SSL functions, data is intercepted before and after encryption and then passed to flexible plugins with full visibility along with all of the available context process/container/host/user/protocol/etc. Qtap makes it possible to understand what's happening with your egress traffic, without modifying apps, installing proxies, or managing certs. Qtap shows you exactly what data is being sent and received in its original, unencrypted form while operating out of band with minimal overhead, without adding latency or disrupting…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or qtap more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and qtap has 1,465. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and qtap free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and qtap under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and qtap?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and qtap in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or qtap?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose qtap if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.