head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs phoenix_live_dashboard
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. phoenix_live_dashboard has 2,176 stars, 206 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 4,037% (90,021 vs 2,176 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; phoenix_live_dashboard is written in Elixir under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, phoenix_live_dashboard 9%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (dashboard), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | phoenix_live_dashboard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 206 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick phoenix_live_dashboard if
- You want the phoenix_live_dashboard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and phoenix_live_dashboard fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About phoenix_live_dashboard
Phoenix LiveDashboard Online Documentation. LiveDashboard provides real time performance monitoring and debugging tools for Phoenix developers. It provides the following modules: Home See general information about the system OS Data See general information about OS, such as CPU, Memory and Disk usage Metrics See how your application performs under different conditions by visualizing :telemetry events with real time charts Request logging See everything that was logged for certain requests Applications See, filter, and search applications in the current node and view their processes in a supervision tree…
read the full phoenix_live_dashboard overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or phoenix_live_dashboard more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and phoenix_live_dashboard has 2,176. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and phoenix_live_dashboard free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and phoenix_live_dashboard under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and phoenix_live_dashboard?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and phoenix_live_dashboard in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or phoenix_live_dashboard?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose phoenix_live_dashboard if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.