head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs pg_activity

worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pg_activity has 3,053 stars, 195 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 2,849% (90,021 vs 3,053 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; pg_activity is written in Python under PostgreSQL. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, pg_activity 6%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 90K pg_activity ★ 3.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor pg_activity
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 3.1K
License AGPL-3.0 PostgreSQL
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 195
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick pg_activity if

  • You want the pg_activity feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the PostgreSQL license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and pg_activity fits your workflow better

full pg_activity profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About pg_activity

Command line tool for PostgreSQL server activity monitoring. Installation From distribution packages The simplest way to install pg\ activity is through the package manager of your Linux distribution, if it ships with a package. E.g., on Debian based distributions (e.g. Debian, Ubuntu, Mint...): $ sudo apt install pg activity (on Debian bullseye, the current stable version, a backport is available: apt install pg activity/bullseye backports ). The PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) also provides packages for RPM based ( and Debian based distributions ( Note: distribution packages may not be up to date…

read the full pg_activity overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or pg_activity more popular?

worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and pg_activity has 3,053. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and pg_activity free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pg_activity under PostgreSQL. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and pg_activity?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and pg_activity in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or pg_activity?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pg_activity if its feature set, stack or PostgreSQL licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.