head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs Peekaping
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Peekaping has 1,210 stars, 87 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 7,340% (90,021 vs 1,210 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Peekaping is written in Go under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Peekaping 7%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | Peekaping | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 87 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Peekaping if
- You want the Peekaping feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Peekaping fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About Peekaping
Peekaping the best uptime kuma alternative A modern, self hosted uptime monitoring solution Peekaping is a uptime monitoring system built with Golang and React. You can monitor your websites, API and many more leveraging beautiful status pages, alert notifications. 🔗 Website peekaping.com 🔗 Live Demo demo.peekaping.com 🔗 Documentation docs.peekaping.com 🔗 Community terraform provider registry.terraform.io/providers/tafaust/peekaping Why Peekaping Is the Optimal Alternative to Uptime Kuma Peekaping is a modern uptime monitoring solution designed with the requirements of professional DevOps teams in mind…
read the full Peekaping overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or Peekaping more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and Peekaping has 1,210. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and Peekaping free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Peekaping under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and Peekaping?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and Peekaping in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or Peekaping?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Peekaping if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.