head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs Peekaping
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Peekaping has 1,191 stars, 69 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 7,178% (86,684 vs 1,191 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Peekaping is written in Go under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Peekaping 6%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | Peekaping | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-05-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 69 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Peekaping if
- You want the Peekaping feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and Peekaping fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About Peekaping
Peekaping is a self hosted uptime monitoring system built with Go on the server and React with TypeScript in the browser, released under the MIT license. It lives in the open source infrastructure and monitoring ecosystem as a direct alternative to Uptime Kuma, and it tracks the availability of websites, APIs, and other network services through a range of monitor types. The project ships with a web interface, status pages, and an alerting layer that can notify operators through many channels when a check fails. It is distributed primarily as Docker images and is documented at peekaping.com, with a live demo and a…
read the full Peekaping overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or Peekaping more popular?
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and Peekaping has 1,191. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and Peekaping free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Peekaping under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and Peekaping?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and Peekaping in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or Peekaping?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Peekaping if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.