head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs open-multi-agent
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-multi-agent has 7,043 stars, 2,440 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,178% (90,021 vs 7,043 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, open-multi-agent 35%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | open-multi-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 7.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 2.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-multi-agent if
- You want the open-multi-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and open-multi-agent fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About open-multi-agent
OMA Agents your organization can own, approve, and audit. OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime: consequential actions wait for durable, tamper evident approvals, and every run leaves a record you can verify offline, byte for byte. Website · Docs · Examples · npm English · 中文 No telemetry. No hosted control plane. Your keys, your models — cloud, local (Ollama, vLLM, llama server), or Chinese providers — your environment. Nothing stops working when the people who built it leave. Get started Requires Node.js 20 or newer. For production, use a currently maintained Node.js LTS release…
read the full open-multi-agent overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or open-multi-agent more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and open-multi-agent has 7,043. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and open-multi-agent free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and open-multi-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and open-multi-agent?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and open-multi-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or open-multi-agent?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-multi-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.