head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs FASTER

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FASTER has 6,636 stars, 596 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,206% (86,684 vs 6,636 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; FASTER is written in C# under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, FASTER 9%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 87K FASTER ★ 6.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor FASTER
GitHub stars ★ 87K ★ 6.6K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-19
Forks ⑂ 13K ⑂ 596
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick FASTER if

  • You want the FASTER feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and FASTER fits your workflow better

full FASTER profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About FASTER

FASTER is an open source project from Microsoft that provides a fast persistent recoverable log and key value store plus cache, implemented in C and C++. It lives in the .NET ecosystem, with a parallel C++ implementation of the key value component, and is distributed primarily through the NuGet package Microsoft.FASTER.Core. The repository carries the MIT license and the project has been in development for roughly eight years, with topics covering concurrent and multi threaded operation, hash tables, indexing, key value storage, logging, persistence, and recoverability.

read the full FASTER overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs openvpn worldmonitor vs wr-do worldmonitor vs plakar worldmonitor vs pluton uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

worldmonitor vs Uptime Kuma worldmonitor vs NetData worldmonitor vs Grafana worldmonitor vs huginn worldmonitor vs Sentry worldmonitor vs SigNoz worldmonitor vs Grafana Loki worldmonitor vs beszel worldmonitor vs cilium worldmonitor vs Apache SkyWalking worldmonitor vs jaeger worldmonitor vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or FASTER more popular?

worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and FASTER has 6,636. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and FASTER free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and FASTER under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and FASTER?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and FASTER in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or FASTER?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose FASTER if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.