head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs evo
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. evo has 4,354 stars, 803 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,968% (90,021 vs 4,354 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; evo is written in Python under GPL-3.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, evo 18%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | evo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 803 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick evo if
- You want the evo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and evo fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About evo
evo Python package for the evaluation of odometry and SLAM This package provides executables and a small library for handling, evaluating and comparing the trajectory output of odometry and SLAM algorithms. Supported trajectory formats: 'TUM' trajectory files 'KITTI' pose files 'EuRoC MAV' (.csv groundtruth and TUM trajectory file) ROS and ROS2 bagfile with geometry msgs/PoseStamped , geometry msgs/TransformStamped , geometry msgs/PoseWithCovarianceStamped , geometry msgs/PointStamped or nav msgs/Odometry topics or TF messages See here for more infos about the formats. Why? evo has several advantages over other…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or evo more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and evo has 4,354. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and evo free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and evo under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and evo?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and evo in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or evo?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose evo if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.