head to head · open source

worldmonitor vs bottom

worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bottom has 14,149 stars, 402 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped yesterday. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 536% (90,021 vs 14,149 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; bottom is written in Rust under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, bottom 3%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

worldmonitor ★ 90K bottom ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

worldmonitor bottom
GitHub stars ★ 90K ★ 14K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 402
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick worldmonitor if

  • You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full worldmonitor profile →

pick bottom if

  • You want the bottom feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and bottom fits your workflow better

full bottom profile →

About worldmonitor

World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…

read the full worldmonitor overview →

About bottom

bottom (btm) A customizable cross platform graphical process/system monitor for the terminal. Supports Linux, macOS, and Windows. Inspired by gtop , gotop , and htop . Demo using the Gruvbox theme ( theme gruvbox ), along with IBM Plex Mono and Kitty Table of contents Features Support Official Unofficial Installation Cargo Alpine Arch Linux Debian / Ubuntu Exherbo Linux Fedora / CentOS / AlmaLinux / Rocky Linux COPR Terra RPM Gentoo Nix openSUSE Snap Solus Void Homebrew MacPorts Chocolatey Scoop winget Windows installer (MSI) Conda gah ghr mise Pre built binaries Auto completion Usage Configuration…

read the full bottom overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is worldmonitor or bottom more popular?

worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and bottom has 14,149. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.

Are worldmonitor and bottom free?

Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and bottom under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between worldmonitor and bottom?

worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and bottom in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, worldmonitor or bottom?

Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose bottom if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.