head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs AutoKuma
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars, 13,147 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutoKuma has 898 stars, 47 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 9,553% (86,684 vs 898 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; AutoKuma is written in Rust under MIT. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, AutoKuma 5%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | AutoKuma | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 898 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 47 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AutoKuma if
- You want the AutoKuma feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and AutoKuma fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About AutoKuma
AutoKuma is an MIT licensed Rust utility that creates Uptime Kuma monitors automatically from Docker container labels, .json / .toml files, or Kubernetes custom resources, made for self hosters and operators who run Uptime Kuma next to containerized services and do not want to add monitors one by one in the web UI.
read the full AutoKuma overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or AutoKuma more popular?
worldmonitor has 86,684 GitHub stars and AutoKuma has 898. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and AutoKuma free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and AutoKuma under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and AutoKuma?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and AutoKuma in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or AutoKuma?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,684 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose AutoKuma if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.