head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs auto-cpufreq
worldmonitor has 86,752 GitHub stars, 13,161 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped today. auto-cpufreq has 7,760 stars, 356 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,018% (86,752 vs 7,760 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; auto-cpufreq is written in Python under GPL-3.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, auto-cpufreq 5%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | auto-cpufreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 87K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 356 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 87K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick auto-cpufreq if
- You want the auto-cpufreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and auto-cpufreq fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor is an open source, real time global intelligence dashboard in TypeScript that aggregates news with AI, monitors geopolitics and infrastructure, and unifies all of it into a single situational awareness interface for analysts, journalists, researchers, and operations teams who need cross domain awareness they can self host.
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About auto-cpufreq
auto cpufreq is a GPL 3.0 Python daemon and command line tool that watches a Linux laptop's battery state, CPU usage, CPU temperature, and system load, then adjusts CPU frequency and power settings automatically for users who want longer battery life without giving up responsiveness.
read the full auto-cpufreq overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or auto-cpufreq more popular?
worldmonitor has 86,752 GitHub stars and auto-cpufreq has 7,760. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and auto-cpufreq free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and auto-cpufreq under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and auto-cpufreq?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and auto-cpufreq in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or auto-cpufreq?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (86,752 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose auto-cpufreq if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.