head to head · open source
worldmonitor vs auto-cpufreq
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars, 13,905 forks, 313 open issues and last shipped yesterday. auto-cpufreq has 7,859 stars, 360 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. worldmonitor leads on adoption by 1,045% (90,021 vs 7,859 stars). worldmonitor is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; auto-cpufreq is written in Python under GPL-3.0. worldmonitor has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, auto-cpufreq 5%. worldmonitor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| worldmonitor | auto-cpufreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 90K | ★ 7.9K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 360 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick worldmonitor if
- You weight community size — 90K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick auto-cpufreq if
- You want the auto-cpufreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and auto-cpufreq fits your workflow better
About worldmonitor
World Monitor 简体中文 日本語 Real time global intelligence dashboard — AI powered news aggregation, geopolitical monitoring, and infrastructure tracking in a unified situational awareness interface. Documentation · Releases · Contributing What It Does Curated news feeds across global and regional categories, AI synthesized into briefs Dual map engine — 3D globe (globe.gl) and WebGL flat map (deck.gl) with a shared map layer catalog Panel inventory — concrete panel implementations across specialized variants Cross stream correlation — military, economic, disaster, and escalation signal convergence Country Instability…
read the full worldmonitor overview →
About auto-cpufreq
auto cpufreq Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux. Actively monitors laptop battery state, CPU usage, CPU temperature, and system load, ultimately allowing you to improve battery life without making any compromises. For tl;dr folks: Youtube: From 10 day vacation project to 100k users: auto cpufreq v3 story Blog post: From 10 day vacation project to 100k users: auto cpufreq v3 story Youtube: auto cpufreq v2.0 release & demo of all available features and options Blog post: auto cpufreq v2.0 Youtube: auto cpufreq tool demo Blog post: auto cpufreq – Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux If…
read the full auto-cpufreq overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is worldmonitor or auto-cpufreq more popular?
worldmonitor has 90,021 GitHub stars and auto-cpufreq has 7,859. worldmonitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are worldmonitor and auto-cpufreq free?
Both are open source. worldmonitor is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and auto-cpufreq under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between worldmonitor and auto-cpufreq?
worldmonitor is written in TypeScript and auto-cpufreq in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, worldmonitor or auto-cpufreq?
Choose worldmonitor if you want the larger community (90,021 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose auto-cpufreq if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.