head to head · open source

Sentry vs witr

Sentry has 44,792 GitHub stars, 4,854 forks, 2,265 open issues and last shipped yesterday. witr has 22,374 stars, 781 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Sentry leads on adoption by 100% (44,792 vs 22,374 stars). Sentry is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; witr is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Sentry has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, witr 3%. Sentry was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (devops, monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Sentry ★ 45K witr ★ 22K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Sentry witr
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 22K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-15
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 781
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Sentry if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Sentry profile →

pick witr if

  • You want the witr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and witr fits your workflow better

full witr profile →

About Sentry

Sentry is an open source debugging platform for detecting, tracing, and fixing software issues in real time. It lives in the developer infrastructure ecosystem and provides error tracking and performance monitoring across languages, frameworks, and runtime environments.

read the full Sentry overview →

About witr

witr is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool with both a command line interface and an interactive terminal UI that traces any process, port, container, or file back to the exact chain of systems that started it, and it is built for operators, SREs, and developers who need to answer "why is this running?" during debugging and incident response.

read the full witr overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Sentry vs Uptime Kuma Sentry vs worldmonitor Sentry vs NetData Sentry vs Grafana Sentry vs huginn Sentry vs SigNoz Sentry vs Grafana Loki Sentry vs beszel Sentry vs cilium Sentry vs Apache SkyWalking Sentry vs jaeger Sentry vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Sentry or witr more popular?

Sentry has 44,792 GitHub stars and witr has 22,374. Sentry has the larger community by that measure.

Are Sentry and witr free?

Both are open source. Sentry has no licence declared in this registry, and witr is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Sentry and witr?

Sentry is written in Python and witr in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Sentry or witr?

Choose Sentry if you want the larger community (44,792 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose witr if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.