head to head · open source
aircrack-ng vs webterminal
aircrack-ng has 7,850 GitHub stars, 1,402 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. webterminal has 1,727 stars, 557 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. aircrack-ng leads on adoption by 355% (7,850 vs 1,727 stars). aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0; webterminal is written in Python under LGPL-3.0. aircrack-ng has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, webterminal 32%. webterminal was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| aircrack-ng | webterminal | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.8K | ★ 1.7K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 557 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick aircrack-ng if
- You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webterminal if
- You want the webterminal feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and webterminal fits your workflow better
About aircrack-ng
Aircrack ng Badges GitHub CI Others Repository versions Description Aircrack ng is a complete suite of tools to assess WiFi network security. It focuses on different areas of WiFi security: Monitoring: Packet capture and export of data to text files for further processing by third party tools. Attacking: Replay attacks, deauthentication, fake access points and others via packet injection. Testing: Checking WiFi cards and driver capabilities (capture and injection). Cracking: WEP and WPA PSK (WPA 1 and 2). All tools are command line which allows for heavy scripting. A lot of GUIs have taken advantage of this…
read the full aircrack-ng overview →
About webterminal
Webterminal bastion server (webterminal堡垒机) Webterminal implemented by django. This project focus on DevOps and Continuous Delivery. For now it support almost 90% remote management protocol such as vnc, ssh,rdp,telnet,sftp... It support a possiblity to monitor and recorded user action when user use this project to manage their server!You can also replay the user action such as like a video. Hope you enjoy it. Features RDP remote desktop control VNC remote desktop control SSH SFTP protocol support Telnet protocol support VNC, RDP, SFTP Remote file browser (download, delete, update and upload files) Remote command…
read the full webterminal overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is aircrack-ng or webterminal more popular?
aircrack-ng has 7,850 GitHub stars and webterminal has 1,727. aircrack-ng has the larger community by that measure.
Are aircrack-ng and webterminal free?
Both are open source. aircrack-ng is licensed under GPL-2.0 and webterminal under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between aircrack-ng and webterminal?
aircrack-ng is written in C and webterminal in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, aircrack-ng or webterminal?
Choose aircrack-ng if you want the larger community (7,850 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose webterminal if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.