head to head · open source

Amphion vs aircrack-ng

Amphion has 10,303 GitHub stars, 851 forks, 174 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. aircrack-ng has 7,659 stars, 1,375 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Amphion leads on adoption by 35% (10,303 vs 7,659 stars). Amphion is written in Python under MIT; aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0. Amphion has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, aircrack-ng 18%. aircrack-ng was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (audit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Amphion ★ 10K aircrack-ng ★ 7.7K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Amphion aircrack-ng
GitHub stars ★ 10K ★ 7.7K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in Python C
Last push 2026-03-25 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 851 ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Amphion if

  • You weight community size — 10K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Amphion profile →

pick aircrack-ng if

  • You want the aircrack-ng feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and aircrack-ng fits your workflow better

full aircrack-ng profile →

About Amphion

Amphion is an MIT licensed Python toolkit for audio, music and speech generation that gives researchers and engineers a shared, reproducible base for tasks such as text to speech, singing voice synthesis, voice conversion and text to audio.

read the full Amphion overview →

About aircrack-ng

Aircrack ng is a GPL 2.0 licensed suite of WiFi security auditing tools written in C, intended for network auditors, penetration testers, and compliance and risk management teams who assess wireless networks on hardware they control.

read the full aircrack-ng overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

Amphion vs lighthouse Amphion vs teleport Amphion vs lynis Amphion vs prowler Amphion vs gs-quant Amphion vs opa Amphion vs checkov Amphion vs kyverno Amphion vs tfsec Amphion vs rundeck Amphion vs agent-governance-toolkit Amphion vs laravel-activitylog

Frequently asked questions

Is Amphion or aircrack-ng more popular?

Amphion has 10,303 GitHub stars and aircrack-ng has 7,659. Amphion has the larger community by that measure.

Are Amphion and aircrack-ng free?

Both are open source. Amphion is licensed under MIT and aircrack-ng under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Amphion and aircrack-ng?

Amphion is written in Python and aircrack-ng in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Amphion or aircrack-ng?

Choose Amphion if you want the larger community (10,303 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose aircrack-ng if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.