head to head · open source
aircrack-ng vs tfsec
aircrack-ng has 7,860 GitHub stars, 1,404 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. tfsec has 7,061 stars, 560 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. aircrack-ng leads on adoption by 11% (7,860 vs 7,061 stars). aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0; tfsec is written in Go under MIT. aircrack-ng has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, tfsec 8%. aircrack-ng was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| aircrack-ng | tfsec | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.9K | ★ 7.1K |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | C | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-09 | 2026-03-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 560 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick aircrack-ng if
- You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tfsec if
- You want the tfsec feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and tfsec fits your workflow better
About aircrack-ng
Aircrack ng Badges GitHub CI Others Repository versions Description Aircrack ng is a complete suite of tools to assess WiFi network security. It focuses on different areas of WiFi security: Monitoring: Packet capture and export of data to text files for further processing by third party tools. Attacking: Replay attacks, deauthentication, fake access points and others via packet injection. Testing: Checking WiFi cards and driver capabilities (capture and injection). Cracking: WEP and WPA PSK (WPA 1 and 2). All tools are command line which allows for heavy scripting. A lot of GUIs have taken advantage of this…
read the full aircrack-ng overview →
About tfsec
📣 tfsec to Trivy Migration As part of our goal to provide a comprehensive open source security solution for all, we have been consolidating all of our scanning related efforts in one place, and that is Trivy. Over the past year, tfsec has laid the foundations to Trivy's IaC & misconfigurations scanning capabilities, including Terraform scanning, which has been natively supported in Trivy for a long time now. Going forward we want to encourage the tfsec community to transition over to Trivy. Moving to Trivy gives you the same excellent Terraform scanning engine, with some extra benefits: 1. Access to more…
read the full tfsec overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Compliance & Risk Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is aircrack-ng or tfsec more popular?
aircrack-ng has 7,860 GitHub stars and tfsec has 7,061. aircrack-ng has the larger community by that measure.
Are aircrack-ng and tfsec free?
Both are open source. aircrack-ng is licensed under GPL-2.0 and tfsec under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between aircrack-ng and tfsec?
aircrack-ng is written in C and tfsec in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, aircrack-ng or tfsec?
Choose aircrack-ng if you want the larger community (7,860 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose tfsec if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.