head to head · open source

lynis vs aircrack-ng

lynis has 16,359 GitHub stars, 1,636 forks, 224 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. aircrack-ng has 7,659 stars, 1,375 forks, 462 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. lynis leads on adoption by 114% (16,359 vs 7,659 stars). lynis is written in Shell under GPL-3.0; aircrack-ng is written in C under GPL-2.0. lynis has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, aircrack-ng 18%. lynis was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lynis ★ 16K aircrack-ng ★ 7.7K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lynis aircrack-ng
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 7.7K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Shell C
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lynis if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lynis profile →

pick aircrack-ng if

  • You want the aircrack-ng feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and aircrack-ng fits your workflow better

full aircrack-ng profile →

About lynis

Lynis is an agentless, GPL 3.0 security auditing and hardening tool that runs on the UNIX based system itself, built for system administrators, auditors, security officers, and penetration testers who need to assess security defenses and test compliance against standards such as ISO27001, PCI DSS, and HIPAA.

read the full lynis overview →

About aircrack-ng

Aircrack ng is a GPL 2.0 licensed suite of WiFi security auditing tools written in C, intended for network auditors, penetration testers, and compliance and risk management teams who assess wireless networks on hardware they control.

read the full aircrack-ng overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

lynis vs lighthouse lynis vs teleport lynis vs prowler lynis vs gs-quant lynis vs opa lynis vs Amphion lynis vs checkov lynis vs kyverno lynis vs tfsec lynis vs rundeck lynis vs agent-governance-toolkit lynis vs laravel-activitylog

Frequently asked questions

Is lynis or aircrack-ng more popular?

lynis has 16,359 GitHub stars and aircrack-ng has 7,659. lynis has the larger community by that measure.

Are lynis and aircrack-ng free?

Both are open source. lynis is licensed under GPL-3.0 and aircrack-ng under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lynis and aircrack-ng?

lynis is written in Shell and aircrack-ng in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lynis or aircrack-ng?

Choose lynis if you want the larger community (16,359 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose aircrack-ng if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.