head to head · open source

archify vs web-maker

archify has 69,263 GitHub stars, 4,648 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. web-maker has 2,698 stars, 324 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. archify leads on adoption by 2,467% (69,263 vs 2,698 stars). archify is written in JavaScript under MIT; web-maker is written in JavaScript under MIT. archify has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, web-maker 12%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

archify ★ 69K web-maker ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

archify web-maker
GitHub stars ★ 69K ★ 2.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick archify if

  • You weight community size — 69K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full archify profile →

pick web-maker if

  • You want the web-maker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-maker fits your workflow better

full web-maker profile →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

About web-maker

Web Maker is an MIT licensed, offline frontend code editor and playground for HTML, CSS and JavaScript experiments that runs entirely on the user's own system, and it is aimed at frontend developers who want CodePen style quick prototyping without a network connection.

read the full web-maker overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 265K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

archify vs ECC archify vs react archify vs Langflow archify vs Supabase archify vs puppeteer archify vs PocketBase archify vs i-have-adhd archify vs codebase-memory-mcp archify vs ToolJet archify vs AppSmith archify vs it-tools archify vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is archify or web-maker more popular?

archify has 69,263 GitHub stars and web-maker has 2,698. archify has the larger community by that measure.

Are archify and web-maker free?

Both are open source. archify is licensed under MIT and web-maker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between archify and web-maker?

archify is written in JavaScript and web-maker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, archify or web-maker?

Choose archify if you want the larger community (69,263 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose web-maker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.