head to head · open source

Supabase vs archify

Supabase has 110,361 GitHub stars, 14,414 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped today. archify has 67,632 stars, 4,517 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped today. Supabase leads on adoption by 63% (110,361 vs 67,632 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; archify is written in JavaScript under MIT. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, archify 7%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K archify ★ 68K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase archify
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 68K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 4.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick archify if

  • You want the archify feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and archify fits your workflow better

full archify profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

ecc vs supabase react vs supabase supabase vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs ECC Supabase vs react Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs puppeteer Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs i-have-adhd Supabase vs codebase-memory-mcp Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs it-tools Supabase vs herdr Supabase vs lapce

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or archify more popular?

Supabase has 110,361 GitHub stars and archify has 67,632. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and archify free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and archify under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and archify?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and archify in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or archify?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (110,361 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose archify if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.