head to head · open source
seaweedfs vs versitygw
seaweedfs has 35,871 GitHub stars, 3,099 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped yesterday. versitygw has 3,087 stars, 330 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 1,062% (35,871 vs 3,087 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; versitygw is written in Go under Apache-2.0. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, versitygw 11%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| seaweedfs | versitygw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 3.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 330 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick seaweedfs if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick versitygw if
- You want the versitygw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and versitygw fits your workflow better
About seaweedfs
SeaweedFS SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system. There are two objectives: 1. to store billions of files! 2. to serve the files fast! One weed binary serves an S3 object store, a POSIX file system, and a lakehouse with S3 Tables, all over the same data. Each blob is one disk read away, capacity grows by starting another volume server, and cloud storage can be cached or tiered transparently. Both read and write operations have O(1) complexity and can run at the full speed supported by the underlying hardware. Download Binaries for different platforms Wiki Documentation Community…
read the full seaweedfs overview →
About versitygw
The Versity S3 Gateway: A High Performance S3 Translation Service Binary release builds Download latest release Use Cases Turn your local filesystem into an S3 server with a single command! Proxy S3 requests to S3 storage Simple to deploy S3 server with a single command Protocol compatibility in posix allows common access to files via posix or S3 Simplified interface for adding new storage system support WebGUI Get more details about the new (optional) WebGUI management/explorer here: S3 RDMA VersityGW supports S3 over RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access), enabling high throughput, low latency object transfers…
read the full versitygw overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is seaweedfs or versitygw more popular?
seaweedfs has 35,871 GitHub stars and versitygw has 3,087. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.
Are seaweedfs and versitygw free?
Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and versitygw under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between seaweedfs and versitygw?
seaweedfs is written in Go and versitygw in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, seaweedfs or versitygw?
Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (35,871 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose versitygw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.