head to head · open source

seaweedfs vs rustfs

seaweedfs has 34,819 GitHub stars, 3,002 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rustfs has 33,108 stars, 1,482 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 5% (34,819 vs 33,108 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, rustfs 4%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

seaweedfs ★ 35K rustfs ★ 33K category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

seaweedfs rustfs
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 33K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick seaweedfs if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full seaweedfs profile →

pick rustfs if

  • You want the rustfs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and rustfs fits your workflow better

full rustfs profile →

About seaweedfs

SeaweedFS is an Apache 2.0 distributed storage system written in Go that serves an S3 compatible object store, a POSIX file system, and Iceberg lakehouse tables from one weed binary, built for storing and serving billions of files with O(1) disk access.

read the full seaweedfs overview →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

seaweedfs vs ClickHouse seaweedfs vs parse-server seaweedfs vs Apache Pinot seaweedfs vs dlt seaweedfs vs hue seaweedfs vs bigquery-utils seaweedfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is seaweedfs or rustfs more popular?

seaweedfs has 34,819 GitHub stars and rustfs has 33,108. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are seaweedfs and rustfs free?

Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rustfs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between seaweedfs and rustfs?

seaweedfs is written in Go and rustfs in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, seaweedfs or rustfs?

Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (34,819 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rustfs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.