head to head · open source
seaweedfs vs mountpoint-s3
seaweedfs has 35,871 GitHub stars, 3,099 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. mountpoint-s3 has 5,794 stars, 255 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 519% (35,871 vs 5,794 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; mountpoint-s3 is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, mountpoint-s3 4%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (fuse, object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| seaweedfs | mountpoint-s3 | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 5.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.1K | ⑂ 255 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick seaweedfs if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mountpoint-s3 if
- You want the mountpoint-s3 feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and mountpoint-s3 fits your workflow better
About seaweedfs
SeaweedFS SeaweedFS is a simple and highly scalable distributed file system. There are two objectives: 1. to store billions of files! 2. to serve the files fast! One weed binary serves an S3 object store, a POSIX file system, and a lakehouse with S3 Tables, all over the same data. Each blob is one disk read away, capacity grows by starting another volume server, and cloud storage can be cached or tiered transparently. Both read and write operations have O(1) complexity and can run at the full speed supported by the underlying hardware. Download Binaries for different platforms Wiki Documentation Community…
read the full seaweedfs overview →
About mountpoint-s3
Mountpoint for Amazon S3 Mountpoint for Amazon S3 is a simple, high throughput file client for mounting an Amazon S3 bucket as a local file system. With Mountpoint for Amazon S3, your applications can access objects stored in Amazon S3 through file operations like open and read . Mountpoint for Amazon S3 automatically translates these operations into S3 object API calls, giving your applications access to the elastic storage and throughput of Amazon S3 through a file interface. Mountpoint for Amazon S3 is optimized for applications that need high read throughput to large objects, potentially from many clients at…
read the full mountpoint-s3 overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is seaweedfs or mountpoint-s3 more popular?
seaweedfs has 35,871 GitHub stars and mountpoint-s3 has 5,794. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.
Are seaweedfs and mountpoint-s3 free?
Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mountpoint-s3 under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between seaweedfs and mountpoint-s3?
seaweedfs is written in Go and mountpoint-s3 in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, seaweedfs or mountpoint-s3?
Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (35,871 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose mountpoint-s3 if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.