head to head · open source

seaweedfs vs mountpoint-s3

seaweedfs has 34,823 GitHub stars, 3,002 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped today. mountpoint-s3 has 5,770 stars, 252 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 504% (34,823 vs 5,770 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; mountpoint-s3 is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, mountpoint-s3 4%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (fuse, object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

seaweedfs ★ 35K mountpoint-s3 ★ 5.8K category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

seaweedfs mountpoint-s3
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 5.8K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 252
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick seaweedfs if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full seaweedfs profile →

pick mountpoint-s3 if

  • You want the mountpoint-s3 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and mountpoint-s3 fits your workflow better

full mountpoint-s3 profile →

About seaweedfs

SeaweedFS is an Apache 2.0 distributed storage system written in Go that serves an S3 compatible object store, a POSIX file system, and Iceberg lakehouse tables from one weed binary, built for storing and serving billions of files with O(1) disk access.

read the full seaweedfs overview →

About mountpoint-s3

Mountpoint for Amazon S3 is a simple, high throughput file client that mounts an Amazon S3 bucket as a local file system, written in Rust and released by AWS Labs under the Apache 2.0 licence for developers and operators who need file level access to objects in S3.

read the full mountpoint-s3 overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

seaweedfs vs ClickHouse seaweedfs vs rustfs seaweedfs vs parse-server seaweedfs vs Apache Pinot seaweedfs vs dlt seaweedfs vs hue seaweedfs vs bigquery-utils seaweedfs vs bigfunctions seaweedfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is seaweedfs or mountpoint-s3 more popular?

seaweedfs has 34,823 GitHub stars and mountpoint-s3 has 5,770. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are seaweedfs and mountpoint-s3 free?

Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mountpoint-s3 under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between seaweedfs and mountpoint-s3?

seaweedfs is written in Go and mountpoint-s3 in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, seaweedfs or mountpoint-s3?

Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (34,823 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose mountpoint-s3 if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.