head to head · open source
seaweedfs vs Apache Pinot
seaweedfs has 34,819 GitHub stars, 3,002 forks, 772 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Apache Pinot has 6,139 stars, 1,509 forks, 1,403 open issues and last shipped yesterday. seaweedfs leads on adoption by 467% (34,819 vs 6,139 stars). seaweedfs is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Apache Pinot is written in Java under Apache-2.0. seaweedfs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Apache Pinot 25%. seaweedfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| seaweedfs | Apache Pinot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 35K | ★ 6.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.0K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick seaweedfs if
- You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Apache Pinot if
- You want the Apache Pinot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and Apache Pinot fits your workflow better
About seaweedfs
SeaweedFS is an Apache 2.0 distributed storage system written in Go that serves an S3 compatible object store, a POSIX file system, and Iceberg lakehouse tables from one weed binary, built for storing and serving billions of files with O(1) disk access.
read the full seaweedfs overview →
About Apache Pinot
Apache Pinot is a real time distributed OLAP datastore built to deliver scalable real time analytics at low latency. It lives in the Java ecosystem, is licensed under Apache 2.0, and was originally built by engineers at LinkedIn and Uber. The project ingests from batch data sources such as Hadoop HDFS, Amazon S3, Azure ADLS, and Google Cloud Storage, as well as from stream data sources such as Apache Kafka. It is designed to scale up and out with no upper bound, and its performance stays constant based on the size of the cluster and an expected query per second threshold.
read the full Apache Pinot overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is seaweedfs or Apache Pinot more popular?
seaweedfs has 34,819 GitHub stars and Apache Pinot has 6,139. seaweedfs has the larger community by that measure.
Are seaweedfs and Apache Pinot free?
Both are open source. seaweedfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Apache Pinot under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between seaweedfs and Apache Pinot?
seaweedfs is written in Go and Apache Pinot in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, seaweedfs or Apache Pinot?
Choose seaweedfs if you want the larger community (34,819 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Apache Pinot if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.